ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Peptide properties predict multistate translocation kinetics via protective antigen nanopores.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rational Engineering of the Anthrax Toxin Nanopore Interface for Orthogonal Peptide Classification.ACS omega · 2026Article
- A dynamical anthrax toxin nanopore biosensor for high-fidelity single-peptide classification.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-molecule analysis of guest-host peptide translocations via anthrax toxin protective antigen (PA) nanopores reveals a multistate kinetic mechanism. K-means clustering identified four distinct conductance states for all peptides tested, including a fully blocked state (state 0), two intermediates (states 1 and 2), and a fully open pore (state 3). Multiexponential kinetic analysis of state-to-state transitions was performed, and the resulting lifetimes and amplitudes were correlated with molecular properties of the guest residue. These correlations revealed which physical properties govern the overall mechanism. The fully blocked state 0 acts as a "hydrophobic trap," with the lifetime of entry transitions (e.g., 1→0) strongly predicted by side-chain hydrophobicity. Conversely, escaping this trap is a steric process governed by molecular size, though the probability of a fast escape is uniquely facilitated by aromaticity, suggesting a specific ungating interaction with the pore's ϕ clamp, which is consistent with clamp site dilation. Rearrangements between partially blocked states are also dominated by hydrophobicity, reflecting solvation/desolvation of guest residues and clamp site during conformational rearrangements. Final dissociation to open nanopore is a multipathway process where the dominant physical force depends on the starting state: escape from deeper states is an energetic battle against hydrophobicity and aromaticity, whereas escape from shallower states presents a final steric hurdle. Overall, this work dissects the peptide translocation process, demonstrating how distinct physical forces-hydrophobicity, sterics, and aromaticity-govern specific, sequential steps of intrapore dynamics and release, providing a detailed energy landscape for peptide-nanopore interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.