ReviewGut microbes2026
Comparative insights into the gut-heart axis: cross-species and cross-population perspectives.
Review in Gut microbes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An oral-gut microbial metabolite linksGut microbes · 2026Article
- Developmental Programming of Drug Response: Microbiota as a Missing Dimension in Perinatal Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms Modulate Isohemagglutinin Titers and Classes: Another Aspect Towards the Link Between ABO Groups and Human Pathologies?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Diet, gut microbiota, and the gut-brain axis: mechanistic interactions and therapeutic implications in neuropsychiatric disorders.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gut microbiota research has rapidly expanded our understanding of host-microbe interactions in cardiovascular diseases, yet translation of these insights remains challenged by species-specific differences and substantial population heterogeneity. In this review, we synthesize current evidence across rodents, swine, non-human primates, and multi-ethnic human cohorts to delineate conserved versus context-dependent features of the gut-heart axis. Rodent models remain indispensable for mechanistic discovery, enabling causal testing through germ-free, antibiotic-treated, and humanized microbiota platforms, whereas large-animal models better replicate human cardiac anatomy, physiology, and microbial ecology. Human studies provide essential clinical relevance, demonstrating that patients with myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure harbor distinct microbial and metabolite signatures. However, these findings vary across populations due to differences in diet, lifestyle, host genetics, medication exposure, and environmental transitions. Despite taxonomic variability, several functional pathways, most notably short-chain fatty acid production, bile acid biotransformation, and aromatic amino acid metabolism generating molecules such as trimethylamine-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.