ArticleScientific reports2026
Reliable and efficient solar radiation estimation with the insights of XAI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unpredictability of solar energy has led to reliability and integration problems that require costly and technically complex solutions in the electrical grid. Solar resource availability and energy generation are highly influenced by local climate variables, like atmospheric temperature, humidity, wind and pressure. If there is generational uncertainty, it is challenging to calculate economic criteria such as energy costs and returns, which impacts the feasibility study of a solar power plant. Also, it is very difficult and costly to maintain pyranometers at the locations. To forecast solar irradiance and the power generation at any location, machine learning (ML) techniques can be used. The present work deals with determining the influence of different parameters in predicting the solar radiation by ML models. A comparison study of six regression models: Ada Boosing Regressor (ABR), Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Decision Tree Regressor (DTR), Linear Regression (LR), and Extreme Gradient Boosting Regressor (XGBR), shows that RFR gave the highest regression score of 0.9028. This also recorded the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.6198 and Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 1.348. The next best regression score produced by the Gradient Boosting Regressor(GBR) with value of 0.891. This is 1.18% lower than the RFR. For the RFR regression analysis, an Explainable AI (XAI) model used to interpret the results using Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) for local surrogacy and Shapely for global surrogacy. Both the LIME and Shapely interpretations shows that the parameter temperature has the highest correlation with the radiation. The paper would benefit from a more explicit statement of what is new compared to prior studies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.