ArticleScientific reports2026
Mathematical analysis of metronomic chemotherapy response in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer: identifying critical parameters from clinical data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present the first clinical application of the Schättler mathematical framework for metronomic chemotherapy using data from 30 patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer from the COMET trial. The model, comprising three coupled ODEs with 12 parameters representing tumour growth, angiogenesis, and immune response, was successfully fitted to individual patient data through AI-assisted optimization, achieving low fitting errors (median squared error: 0.003 for stable disease, 0.007 for progressive disease) at day 56. The growth control parameter ξ emerged as a potential biomarker, with distinct ranges between stable disease (0.066-0.153) and progressive disease (0.093-0.177), suggesting a critical threshold around [Formula: see text]. Model parameters showed expected interdependencies reflecting the coupled nature of tumour-microenvironment interactions. While the model demonstrated strong fitting capabilities, prediction of progression-free survival showed moderate correlation ([Formula: see text]), highlighting the complexity of long-term outcome prediction in metastatic disease. Drug effect parameters were consistently low (0.003-0.09), aligning with the modest clinical benefits observed in recent metronomic chemotherapy trials for metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. This proof-of-concept study establishes the feasibility of applying the Schättler framework to clinical data, with parameter estimates representing exploratory values requiring external validation before clinical implementation. Future studies with larger cohorts and multiple time points will be essential to validate these findings and refine the model for prospective clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.