Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41521256›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Towards the transformation of MATLAB models into FPGA-Based hardware accelerators.

Sezen Bal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sezen BalDepartment of Computer Technologies, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey. sezen.bal@marmara.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a layer-wise, verification-oriented methodology for transferring computational models developed in MATLAB to Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)–based hardware accelerators while preserving functional equivalence in a quantitatively verifiable manner. Existing MATLAB-to-FPGA conversion tools primarily focus on synthesis and resource optimization. In contrast, the proposed approach introduces a validated workflow that explicitly ensures layer-wise numerical consistency between software and hardware implementations. At each stage of the MATLAB–C++–FPGA workflow, golden output based verification is performed by comparing layer activations from a high-level synthesis (HLS)–based C + + model and the hardware implementation against reference outputs obtained in MATLAB. Layer-level accuracy is evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE) metric, with all layers achieving MAE values below 1.5 × 10⁻³ when comparing MATLAB floating-point (FP) reference outputs with the HLS-based C + + model. Hardware validation is conducted on the Python Productivity for Zynq (PYNQ)-Z1 FPGA board. The convolutional layers are executed on the programmable logic (PL) using fixed-point arithmetic, while softmax and verification computations are performed on the processing system (PS) using FP arithmetic. This design maintains an end-to-end data flow from FP to fixed-point on the PL and back to FP, ensuring numerical accuracy and traceability across computational domains. The results demonstrate that the proposed method provides a reproducible verification framework for one-dimensional (1D) convolutional neural network (CNN)–based models and complements performance-oriented FPGA acceleration workflows by introducing a quantitatively traceable accuracy-preservation mechanism.

Indexed as

Deep learningEmbedded systemsFPGAHardware accelerationHigh-Level synthesisMATLABSignal processing

Identifiers

PMID41521256
PMCPMC12877057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.