ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2026
Hypertension in Diabetes: Numbers or Outcomes?
Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is one of the most frequent and consequential comorbidities in people with diabetes, yet its management remains less straightforward than guideline tables might suggest. Epidemiological evidence confirms the high prevalence and the disproportionate burden of cardiovascular and renal complications in this dual condition. The pathophysiology is complex: insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) interact, often with cumulative effects. Most recommendations endorse a blood pressure (BP) target below 130/80 mmHg, but whether strict numerical thresholds should dominate practice remains debated. Therapies such as RAAS inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors demonstrate consistent benefits, extending beyond BP reductions. Given this multifactorial background, combination therapy carries a strong rationale, as it allows simultaneous targeting of multiple pathophysiological abnormalities. This article argues that success should be judged not only by BP values but by the outcomes that alter prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41521278What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.