ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Effects of at-risk drinking on central hemodynamics and aortic stiffness in midlife adults.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of at-risk drinking on central hemodynamics and aortic stiffness in midlife adults.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the effect of at-risk drinking on central hemodynamics and aortic stiffness in midlife adults. A total of 38 midlife men and 41 postmenopausal women, aged 50-64 and free of major clinical diseases, were included. Based on USAUDIT-C scores derived from the U.S. Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, participants were classified as low-risk drinkers (n = 50) or at-risk drinkers (n = 29). Central blood pressure (BP), aortic wave reflection indices, as well as carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV; a measure of aortic stiffness) were measured. Regardless of sex (p = 0.11 for both), among participants free of antihypertensive medications (n = 51), at-risk drinkers had higher central systolic (p = 0.002) and diastolic BP (p < 0.001) compared with low-risk drinkers, while there was no between-group difference in central BP among treated participants (n = 28; p ≥ 0.41). Among untreated participants, higher USAUDIT-C scores remained independently associated with elevated systolic (p < 0.001) and diastolic BP (p = 0.003), after controlling for wave reflection indices and cfPWV. Regardless of antihypertensive medication use (p ≥ 0.25) and sex (p ≥ 0.10), no between-group differences were observed in aortic wave reflection indices (p ≥ 0.18) and cfPWV (p = 0.16). These findings suggest that elevated central BP associated with at-risk drinking is related to mechanisms other than enhanced aortic wave reflection or aortic stiffening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.