Evidence mapPaperPMID 41521396Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2026

Effects of at-risk drinking on central hemodynamics and aortic stiffness in midlife adults.

Keng-Yu Chang, Zhaoli Liu, Hitesh Nirmal, Brooks A Hibner, Maysa Nashawati, John O Kolade, Yeonwoo Kim, R Matthew Brothers, Shane A Phillips, Chueh-Lung Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Keng-Yu ChangDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
Zhaoli LiuCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
Hitesh NirmalDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
Brooks A HibnerDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2830-4482
Maysa NashawatiDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
John O KoladeDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
Yeonwoo KimDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.
R Matthew BrothersDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-5277
Shane A PhillipsDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chueh-Lung HwangDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-4802

Funding

NIAAA NIH HHS AA028537NIAAA NIH HHS AA028537-SupplementNIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA028537NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA028537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the effect of at-risk drinking on central hemodynamics and aortic stiffness in midlife adults. A total of 38 midlife men and 41 postmenopausal women, aged 50-64 and free of major clinical diseases, were included. Based on USAUDIT-C scores derived from the U.S. Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, participants were classified as low-risk drinkers (n = 50) or at-risk drinkers (n = 29). Central blood pressure (BP), aortic wave reflection indices, as well as carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV; a measure of aortic stiffness) were measured. Regardless of sex (p = 0.11 for both), among participants free of antihypertensive medications (n = 51), at-risk drinkers had higher central systolic (p = 0.002) and diastolic BP (p < 0.001) compared with low-risk drinkers, while there was no between-group difference in central BP among treated participants (n = 28; p ≥ 0.41). Among untreated participants, higher USAUDIT-C scores remained independently associated with elevated systolic (p < 0.001) and diastolic BP (p = 0.003), after controlling for wave reflection indices and cfPWV. Regardless of antihypertensive medication use (p ≥ 0.25) and sex (p ≥ 0.10), no between-group differences were observed in aortic wave reflection indices (p ≥ 0.18) and cfPWV (p = 0.16). These findings suggest that elevated central BP associated with at-risk drinking is related to mechanisms other than enhanced aortic wave reflection or aortic stiffening.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHemodynamicsVascular StiffnessBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulse Wave Analysisalcohol drinkingarterial stiffnessblood pressurecardiovascular disease riskswave reflection

Identifiers

PMID41521396
PMCPMC12791031

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.