Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41522482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

The psychosis spectrum and underlying factors in female youth with eating disorders: a cross-sectional observational experience sampling methodology study.

A J M Roedelof, C J P Simons, S Mulkens, M Marcelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A J M RoedelofInstitute for Mental Health care Eindhoven (GGzE), Eindhoven, Netherlands.
C J P SimonsInstitute for Mental Health care Eindhoven (GGzE), Eindhoven, Netherlands.
S MulkensDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
M MarcelisInstitute for Mental Health care Eindhoven (GGzE), Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Recent reviews indicated that the psychosis spectrum co-occurs with disorders on the eating disorder (ED) spectrum, which might elucidate the low recovery rates. Consequently, the ED field is encouraged to better understand the interplay between these two spectra. This study examined whether female youth with EDs experience higher levels of psychotic phenomena than controls, including associations between different levels of (subclinical) psychosis and the factors negative affect (NA), self-esteem, stress, and ED severity. Method: A cross-sectional study using experience sampling methodology (ESM) for 10 days involved 50 young female individuals with EDs and 50 controls. Subclinical psychotic experiences (PE), psychotic symptoms, and disorders were assessed using ESM, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. ED severity was assessed with the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire. Mixed effects, logistic, and linear regression models were used for the analyses. Results: The ED group had significantly more momentary PE ( Discussion: All levels of psychosis were common in female youth with an ED, and these (subclinical) psychotic phenomena were associated with transdiagnostic factors such as momentary NA, self-esteem, and stress and/or ED severity. The findings have relevance for clinical practice and inform future transdiagnostic studies on the mechanism and treatment of individuals with EDs and (comorbid) psychosis.

Indexed as

eating disordersecological momentary assessmentpsychosis spectrumpsychotic experiencestransdiagnostics

Identifiers

PMID41522482
PMCPMC12785176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.