ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Pulsatile Flow Modeling and Targeted Drug Delivery Optimization in Computational Hemodynamics.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward universal representations of the living: Physiological invariance for transportable medical AI.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Targeted drug delivery in vascular diseases requires accurate modeling of blood flow dynamics. This study utilizes physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to simulate pulsatile hemodynamics and optimize delivery timing for maximum therapeutic efficacy. Methods: A PINN framework was developed to solve the Navier-Stokes and convection-diffusion equations in a reconstructed arterial domain. Pulsatile inlet conditions were imposed to replicate physiological blood flow. Drug bolus injections were simulated at varying phases of the cardiac cycle to evaluate optimal timing. Results: The model achieved high accuracy with under 2% relative error compared to finite element benchmarks. Maximum drug accumulation (78%) at the target site occurred when injected 0.2 seconds post-systole, with minimal off-target dispersion (8%). Hemodynamic parameters, such as peak velocity (0.65 m/s) and wall shear stress (2.5 Pa), were consistent with physiological norms. Conclusion: PINNs offer a robust, data-efficient approach for simulating vascular dynamics and optimizing personalized drug delivery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.