Evidence mapPaperPMID 41522916Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Physics-Informed Neural Network-Based Pulsatile Flow Modeling and Targeted Drug Delivery Optimization in Computational Hemodynamics.

Aaryasinh Kunalsinh Vaghela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aaryasinh Kunalsinh VaghelaHematology Research, BASIS Independent McLean, Herndon, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Targeted drug delivery in vascular diseases requires accurate modeling of blood flow dynamics. This study utilizes physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to simulate pulsatile hemodynamics and optimize delivery timing for maximum therapeutic efficacy. Methods: A PINN framework was developed to solve the Navier-Stokes and convection-diffusion equations in a reconstructed arterial domain. Pulsatile inlet conditions were imposed to replicate physiological blood flow. Drug bolus injections were simulated at varying phases of the cardiac cycle to evaluate optimal timing. Results: The model achieved high accuracy with under 2% relative error compared to finite element benchmarks. Maximum drug accumulation (78%) at the target site occurred when injected 0.2 seconds post-systole, with minimal off-target dispersion (8%). Hemodynamic parameters, such as peak velocity (0.65 m/s) and wall shear stress (2.5 Pa), were consistent with physiological norms. Conclusion: PINNs offer a robust, data-efficient approach for simulating vascular dynamics and optimizing personalized drug delivery strategies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular modelingcomputational hemodynamicsdrug deliveryphysics-informed neural networkspulsatile flowwall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID41522916
PMCPMC12788563

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.