ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Different Antihypertensive Classes in Early-Stage Hypertension with Renal Function Consideration.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension remains a leading cause of cardiovascular and renal morbidity worldwide. In early-stage hypertension, appropriate pharmacological intervention is crucial to prevent target organ damage, especially renal impairment. Materials and Methods: A randomized, controlled, open-label study was conducted over 12 weeks at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 120 patients newly diagnosed with Stage 1 hypertension (SBP 140-159 mmHg or DBP 90-99 mmHg) were enrolled and equally divided into three groups: Group A (ACE inhibitors), Group B (CCBs), and Group C (beta-blockers). Baseline and post-treatment parameters including systolic and diastolic BP, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and paired Results: The SBP was reduced by the largest percentage in group A (ACE inhibitors; mean decrease of 16.4+/- 3.2 mmHg) as well as in group C (CG intervention; mean decrease 16.2+/- 2.2 mmHg), and the eGFR increased by the largest percentage in group A (ACE inhibitors; mean increase of 5.6+/- 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m 2). Group B (CCBs) had modest reduction in BP (mean SBP lowering of 13.7 + 2.9 mmHg) and little effect on the renal functionality. The beta-blockers (group C) achieved the lowest amount of reduction in SBP (11.2 + 3.1 mmHg) and minimal change in eGFR at mean reduction of 1.4 + 2.1 mL/minute/1.73 m 2. Conclusion: ACE inhibitors are more effective in controlling early-stage hypertension and provide additional renal protective benefits compared to CCBs and beta-blockers. These findings support the preferential use of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive patients with early signs of renal function compromise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.