ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Association Between Serum Vitamin D Levels and Glycemic Status in Prediabetic Adults.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vitamin D is very important for insulin secretion and sensitivity, and not getting enough of it has been related to problems with glucose metabolism. Prediabetes is a stage of glucose intolerance that can be reversed. Finding modifiable risk factors, such as a lack of vitamin D, can aid with early intervention. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analytical investigation was done with 120 persons between the ages of 30 and 60 who had been diagnosed with prediabetes based on HbA1c readings between 5.7% and 6.4%. We used a chemiluminescent immunoassay to find out how much 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was in the serum. We put the participants into three categories based on their vitamin D levels: deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20-29 ng/mL), and sufficient (≥30 ng/mL). We looked at glycemic indicators, such as fasting blood glucose (FBG), HbA1c, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance among groups. Results: Out of 120 people, 48 (40%) were low in vitamin D, 44 (36.7%) were not getting enough, and 28 (23.3%) were getting enough. The average FBG was much greater in the group that did not get enough vitamin D (112.3 ± 9.4 mg/dL) than in the group that did (102.1 ± 8.6 mg/dL) ( Conclusion: A lack of vitamin D is strongly linked to poor blood sugar management in persons who are prediabetic. Checking and fixing vitamin D levels may help those who are at risk of getting type 2 diabetes delay or avoid getting it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.