ReviewCardiac failure review2025
Reverse Remodelling, Myocardial Recovery and Remission in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Management Strategies.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotype-Specific Gradients of NT-proBNP Reflect Distinct Functional and Structural Remodeling Signatures in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac reverse remodelling (RR) is a complex process involving structural and functional recovery of the myocardium, with significant implications for the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). This review summarises current concepts, underlying mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and clinical implications of RR, while distinguishing it from myocardial recovery and remission. Both pharmacological therapies and non-pharmacological interventions have shown potential to induce RR in selected populations. Clinical features, echocardiographic parameters, advanced imaging findings, and biomarkers help stratify patients according to the likelihood of recovery and risk of relapse. The management of HF with improved ejection fraction remains debated. High recurrence rates are seen after therapy discontinuation; however, evidence suggests that partial withdrawal may be safe in specific patient profiles. RR should be considered a central therapeutic goal in HF care, although its extent and stability vary widely. Differentiating between transient improvement, remission under therapy, and true myocardial recovery is critical for guiding long-term treatment decisions, highlighting the importance of individualised follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.