ArticleCureus2025
Unmasking the Giant Condyloma: A Case Report and Literature Review of Buschke-Löwenstein Tumor.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buschke-Lowenstein tumors (BLTs) are rare, slow-growing, cauliflower-like lesions of the perineal region. Despite its benign histology, it may be a precursor of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), as it possesses the potential for malignant transformation. Multiple sexual partners and early sexual debut are among the main risk factors. Topical therapy and minimally invasive excisional therapies may be applied in mild cases. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy have also been described, presenting limited efficacy. Surgery remains the gold-standard treatment, especially for extensive lesions, as demonstrated in our case. We report the case of a heterosexual 33-year-old male patient with extensive penoscrotal, pubic, inguinal, and perineal anodyne lesions, ongoing for 14 months. In the past two years, two different sexual partners were reported. Due to the extent of the lesions, a multidisciplinary approach was required, consisting of a urologist and a plastic surgeon. The histopathological analysis confirmed the original diagnosis of a BLT consistent with human papillomavirus effect, ruling out any possibility of malignant transformation to SCC. Skin flaps were used to reconstruct the skin defect. A complete wound closure was achieved at four weeks postoperatively. A year later, the patient is free of any similar lesions. Surgical excision of the tumor is still the benchmark of BLT treatment. It features the ability to confirm the diagnosis as well. Based on the extent of the lesions and the consequent skin defect, a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended. Due to the high recurrence rate and potential malignant transformation, a close follow-up is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.