Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523484›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Early Palliative Care in Heart Transplant Evaluation.

William S Stringer, Alissa A Ulanday, Christine M Bui, Rachel M Verhagen, Shelley J Choi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William S StringerMedicine, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Alissa A UlandayNursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Christine M BuiPalliative Care, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Rachel M VerhagenBehavioral Health, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Shelley J ChoiPalliative Care, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care (PC) is becoming increasingly integrated into the care of patients with advanced heart failure, although it is not yet widely incorporated into the heart transplant evaluation process. Patients undergoing evaluation for heart transplant carry a high burden of mental health morbidity, which can affect their ability to complete the evaluation and undergo successful transplantation. We describe the case of a 67-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy on continuous inotropic support for decompensated heart failure, who initially declined to complete a transplant evaluation and expressed a desire for immediate hospital discharge. PC involvement clarified his prognosis without advanced heart failure therapies, and identified severe claustrophobia as the driver of his desire to end the transplant evaluation. With appropriate psychologic and psychiatric support, his claustrophobia became tolerable, and he underwent successful heart transplantation. With expertise in symptom management and effective communication, PC plays a crucial role as a bridge between medical and psychosocial teams, particularly when psychopathology is present. Appropriate PC involvement in the transplant evaluation process can identify and navigate barriers, and ensure goal-concordant, patient-centered care.

Indexed as

claustrophobiagoals of careorthotopic heart transplantationpalliative caretransplant candidacytransplant evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41523484
PMCPMC12782207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.