ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Optimizing recruitment strategies for healthy older adults in prevention clinical trials: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Older adults aged 75 and older (75+) represent the fastest-growing demographic in the USA yet remain underrepresented in prevention-focused clinical research. This scoping review evaluated recruitment strategies used in healthy aging clinical trials targeting this population, with particular attention to technology-enabled and belonging-focused approaches. A PubMed search initially identified only four US-based studies focused on adults aged 75+. To broaden the scope and enrich the analysis, additional studies involving adults aged 65+ and those with pre-existing conditions were included, yielding a total of 23 relevant studies. Recruitment strategies were analyzed using the Design for Belonging framework to assess how inclusion and engagement were fostered. Findings revealed that adults aged 75+ preferred traditional methods - targeted mailings, phone calls, and in-person outreach - due to barriers related to digital access and usability. In contrast, adults aged 65+ showed greater receptivity to digital tools such as electronic health records, social media, and web-based enrollment. Community engagement and culturally tailored materials are effective across all age groups. However, few studies addressed later-stage engagement strategies like advocacy and trust repair. These results underscore the importance of tailoring recruitment strategies to aging subgroups, combining personalized outreach with inclusive design to enhance equity and retention in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.