ArticleHuman mutation2026
Itaconate-Related Gene Signatures as Prognostic Markers in Colon Cancer: Insights From Transcriptomic and Spatial Analysis.
Article in Human mutation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colon cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors. Accurate evaluation of patient prognosis and optimization of treatment strategies continue to be major research focuses in colon cancer. Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, this study is the first to comprehensively analyze the expression, biological roles, and prognosis of itaconate and Hallmark pathway-related genes in colon cancer using bulk transcriptomics, single-cell transcriptomics, and spatial transcriptomics data. Through strict screening in 448 colon cancer patients from TCGA database (training set) and 7 colon cancer prognostic models from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (including 1473 cases in the validation set), 10 prognosis-related genes (TIMP1, FJX1, CD36, CXCL1, ETS2, CDKN2A, INHBB, PLEC, TUBB2, and P4HA1) were selected. The optimal prognostic prediction model (Enet [alpha = 0.2]) was constructed and validated, which showed good prognostic predictive value in both the training and validation sets (average C-index > 0.7) and was superior to previous conventional clinical features and 22 prognostic models developed by researchers in the past 4 years. ScRNAseq (GSE225857) and spatial transcriptomics analyses clarified the cell-specific expression and spatial distribution characteristics of these genes in the tumor microenvironment (TME), with high functional scores mainly enriched in epithelial and stromal cells. Tissue microarray (TMA) showed that the high-risk group had higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes, suggesting higher sensitivity to immunotherapy. Drug sensitivity analysis identified four potentially effective drugs, such as sepantronium bromide, which had better effects on high-risk patients. This study provides a theoretical basis and new targets for precise prognosis and stratified treatment of colon cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.