ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
A bibliometric analysis of publication trends in strabismus over the past 30y.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo summarize publication trends in the field of strabismus over the past 30y and predict future research hotspots.
methodsA total of 2915 English-language articles and reviews on strabismus, published between 1993 and 2022, were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software to explore publication trends, as well as the contributions and collaborative networks of countries/regions, authors, institutions, and journals.
resultsThe annual number of publications on strabismus showed a consistent upward trend. The United States (USA) maintained a leading position in this research field while Republic of Korea and China emerged as rapidly advancing contributors over the last decade. The University of California, Los Angeles ranked as the most productive institution, and Jonathan M. Holmes from USA was the most productive author.
conclusionThis study provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of strabismus research, revealing the evolution of research hotspots over the past 30y and outlining several cutting-edge directions for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.