ArticleThe breast journal2026
Information Needs and Preferences of Men With Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Internet Forum Posts.
Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Information Needs and Preferences of Men With Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Internet Forum Posts.The breast journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Sex-/gender-specific health information for men with breast cancer is lacking. Health information supports patients in shared decision-making. When developing evidence-based health information, it is important to identify the patients' information needs and preferences with regard to age, sex or gender, and other diversity aspects, including how the content is provided for the target group. However, studies show that sex/gender differences have rarely been considered. Our study investigates the information needs and preferences of cisgender men with breast cancer. Methods: A content-structuring, qualitative content analysis of forum posts was performed. Internet forums and posts were selected according to the following criteria: relevance of the topic, English or German language, and public availability without registration. A qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz was conducted. The selected posts were coded using MAXQDA. Results: A total of 1025 posts from three Internet forums were screened, and 96 posts were included for analysis-most of them from a German Internet forum. We identified seven main categories and 26 subcategories. Information needs and preferences are represented by the following main categories: "Epidemiology and general questions about the disease," "Diagnostics," "Therapy," "Physician specialist services," "Rehabilitation and lifestyle adaption," and "Mental health." Additionally, the "Preference for and access to current information" plays a role for the patients. Conclusions: Our study provides new insights into the information needs and preferences of men with breast cancer, mainly from German-speaking countries. Providing accurate and reliable health information that meets patients' needs and preferences is an ethical duty and has to be provided by healthcare systems. Such patient-centered and inclusive health care will empower patients to make informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.