Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524056›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Precision Medicine for Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Clinical Relevance, Challenges, and Advances.

Kamran Namjouyan, Ervin Sejdić, Mark S Link, Antonio Pelliccia, Benjamin Glicksberg, Natalia Trayanova, Chayakrit Krittanawong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kamran NamjouyanDepartment of Cardiology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA 17821, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6210-4961
Ervin SejdićEdward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-8298
Mark S LinkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-9296
Antonio PellicciaDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Sports Medicine and Science, 00197 Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-3401
Benjamin GlicksbergHasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-8090
Natalia TrayanovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-063X
Chayakrit KrittanawongHumanX, Delaware, DE 19801, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-335X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) remain a foundational pillar of cardiovascular diagnostics, providing rapid, non-invasive diagnosis and being universally accessible to all clinicians. An ECG captures the electrical signals of the heart via a standard 12-lead configuration, offering insights into arrhythmias, conduction delays, ischemic injury, structural remodeling, and systemic pathologies with cardiac implications. This review presents a structured framework for ECG interpretation by discussing general approaches to rate, rhythm, axis, intervals, and repolarization dynamics, and by outlining both cardiac and non-cardiac conditions associated with ECG abnormalities. We explore the accelerating pace of innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) for ECG analysis. Deep learning algorithms now rival and, in select domains, surpass expert clinicians in detecting left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, and acute myocardial infarction. The integration of AI-enhanced ECG interpretation enables earlier disease recognition, refined risk stratification, and optimized clinical decision-making across acute and chronic care settings. This review systematically guides readers through ECG interpretation, linking fundamental principles with nuanced clinical patterns using AI to enhance accurate diagnosis and improve patient outcomes across a wide range of cardiovascular conditions.

Indexed as

arrhythmia detectioncardiovascular diagnosticsECG interpretationECG screeningelectrocardiogramnon-invasive cardiac assessmentpatient outcomesrisk stratificationsudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID41524056
PMCPMC12781007

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.