Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524080›Full record

ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2025

Cardiac Sympathetic Innervation and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Structural Heart Disease: Current Peripheral Neuromodulation Therapies and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.

Léa Benabou, Marmar Vaseghi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Léa BenabouUCLA Electrophysiology Programs, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, CA, US.
Marmar VaseghiUCLA Electrophysiology Programs, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, CA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-9706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several decades, substantial evidence has pointed to the role of the autonomic nervous system in the genesis and maintenance of ventricular arrhythmia. In particular, sympathetic activation has been shown to increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmia, particularly in the context of structural heart diseases, and is a key target of neuromodulatory therapies. Current peripheral sympathetic neuromodulatory approaches include temporary interventions, such as stellate ganglion block, proximal intercostal block, and thoracic epidural anaesthesia, as well as more definitive therapies, such as cardiac sympathetic denervation and renal denervation. Each of these approaches presents distinct strengths and limitations, as well as side effects that warrant careful consideration in clinical practice and highlight the need for more targeted strategies. Emerging interventions focusing on neuropeptide Y, sympathetic afferents ablation, high-frequency block of efferent nerves, and the restoration of sympathetic innervation after MI have shown promising potential. However, further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of these novel therapies prior to their implementation in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Indexed as

Autonomic nervous systemneuromodulationneuropeptide YsympatheticTRPV1ventricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID41524080
PMCPMC12784272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.