Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524153›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2026

Physiology- versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for people with coronary artery disease.

Satoshi Higuchi, Noyuri Yamaji, Hisashi Noma, Marie Ito, Yuya Yokota, Erika Ota, Takeshi Hasegawa

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Satoshi HiguchiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7914-8256
Noyuri YamajiInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisashi NomaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Marie ItoDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Fujigaoka Hospital, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yuya YokotaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Showa Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Erika OtaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi HasegawaInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objectives To evaluate the benefits and harms of physiology-guided PCI compared to angiography-guided PCI for cardiovascular events in individuals with CCS and ACS. Secondary objectives To assess potential differences in the effectiveness and safety of physiology-guided PCI according to patient characteristics, including sex and age, from the perspective of equity.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41524153
PMCPMC12794143

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.