SynthesisEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: the effect of potassium-competitive acid blockers on nighttime symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Synthesis in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers as a New Frontier in Acid-Related Disorders and the Role of South Korean Pharmacological Innovation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Protonation of Key Acidic Residues Reveals Binding Features of PCABs to Gastric H, K-ATPase.The Journal of membrane biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), a new class of potent and sustained acid-suppressing drugs, have emerged as an alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) management. However, the specific benefits of PCABs for nocturnal GERD symptoms remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCAB therapy compared with PPIs or placebo for managing nighttime heartburn and related symptoms in adults with GERD. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to August 8, 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any PCAB (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, or fexuprazan) with either a PPI or placebo in adult GERD patients. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with complete resolution of nighttime heartburn throughout the treatment period; the secondary outcome was the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models with risk ratios (RRs). Sensitivity analyses were used to assess the robustness of the results. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Three RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. PCABs significantly increased the likelihood of complete nighttime heartburn resolution compared with PPIs (RR2.29, 95% CI 1.36-3.87; p = 0.002), with no heterogeneity. Safety analysis of the three trials showed no significant difference in TEAE risk (RR0.88, 95% CI 0.53-1.45; p = 0.62). The findings were consistent across all sensitivity analyses. Our study results suggest that PCABs therapy may provide better nighttime heartburn resolution than PPIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41524830What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.