ReviewCurrent microbiology2026
Natural-Compound Adjuvants Dismantle Candida Biofilms: Mechanisms, Design Rules, and Biofilm-Aware Pharmacology.
Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection to Disruption: A Comprehensive Review of Bacterial Biofilms and Therapeutic Advances.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Candida Infections in Marine Mammals: Epidemiology, Antifungal Resistance, and One Health Implications.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Device- and mucosa-associated candidiasis is difficult to cure because Candida biofilms shield cells from antifungals, leading to relapse and device failure. Standard treatment decisions are still largely guided by planktonic susceptibility tests, which poorly predict the drug exposure needed to clear mature biofilms. Here we synthesize evidence that natural-compound adjuvants can dismantle key biofilm defenses and outline design rules to rationalize biofilm-aware combination therapy. Across Candida albicans, non-albicans species and Candida auris, the most reproducible adjuvant effects fell into three themes: (1) reprogramming adhesion and morphogenesis, (2) disrupting membrane sterol homeostasis, and (3) weakening the extracellular matrix and efflux-mediated tolerance. When paired with standard antifungals, these actions frequently increase killing of established biofilms and reduce the exposures required for eradication. Local delivery approaches that concentrate actives at mucosal surfaces or device interfaces (nano- or surface-directed formulations) further improve intrabiofilm exposure while limiting systemic toxicity. We conclude that translation will require standardized biofilm assays, species-stratified testing and tighter links between biofilm pharmacology and clinically achievable exposure. The framework presented here is intended to help prioritize natural adjuvants and combinations most likely to benefit device-associated and mucosal candidiasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.