Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524898›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2026

Natural-Compound Adjuvants Dismantle Candida Biofilms: Mechanisms, Design Rules, and Biofilm-Aware Pharmacology.

Dang Anh Tuan, Jan Masak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dang Anh TuanFaculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, 166 28, Czechia. tuan.dang.anh@vscht.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-4072
Jan MasakFaculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, 166 28, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-0824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Device- and mucosa-associated candidiasis is difficult to cure because Candida biofilms shield cells from antifungals, leading to relapse and device failure. Standard treatment decisions are still largely guided by planktonic susceptibility tests, which poorly predict the drug exposure needed to clear mature biofilms. Here we synthesize evidence that natural-compound adjuvants can dismantle key biofilm defenses and outline design rules to rationalize biofilm-aware combination therapy. Across Candida albicans, non-albicans species and Candida auris, the most reproducible adjuvant effects fell into three themes: (1) reprogramming adhesion and morphogenesis, (2) disrupting membrane sterol homeostasis, and (3) weakening the extracellular matrix and efflux-mediated tolerance. When paired with standard antifungals, these actions frequently increase killing of established biofilms and reduce the exposures required for eradication. Local delivery approaches that concentrate actives at mucosal surfaces or device interfaces (nano- or surface-directed formulations) further improve intrabiofilm exposure while limiting systemic toxicity. We conclude that translation will require standardized biofilm assays, species-stratified testing and tighter links between biofilm pharmacology and clinically achievable exposure. The framework presented here is intended to help prioritize natural adjuvants and combinations most likely to benefit device-associated and mucosal candidiasis.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, PharmaceuticAntifungal AgentsBiofilmsBiological ProductsCandidaCandidiasisCandida albicansHumansAdjuvants, PharmaceuticAntifungal AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID41524898
PMCPMC12795885

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.