ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
Differences in Dyadic Coping Between Couples Facing Early-Stage Dementia Compared with Couples Facing a Visual Impairment and Healthy Couples.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of dyadic coping (DC) describes ways in which couples cope with stress together, including, for example, supportive DC (i.e., supporting a partner's individual coping efforts) or delegated DC (i.e., taking over tasks from one's partner). Previous research has primarily focused on DC in relation to chronic physical illnesses, foremost cancer. However, stress related to neurocognitive or physical conditions differs with regard to symptoms, course of progression, and associated psychological and social challenges. The current study aims to examine how DC in individuals with early-stage dementia differs from DC in individuals with a visual impairment or in a healthy condition, as well as how DC differs between their partners. Data from two studies were first matched with a sample of couples facing early-stage dementia (n = 37). Couples facing a visual impairment and healthy couples served as control groups. The Dyadic Coping Inventory was used to assess the DC exchanged. Analyses of variance and covariance as well as post hoc tests were used to test for differences in DC. Results show that partners of persons with early-stage dementia report receiving less supportive DC than partners in couples facing a visual impairment or healthy couples, as well as less delegated DC than partners in healthy couples. We did not find any differences on any DC domains in the persons with early-stage dementia compared to persons with visual impairment or persons in healthy couples. This study shows that DC of partners in couples facing early-stage dementia differs from partners in couples facing a visual impairment or healthy couples. Partners should avoid overprotective behaviors that could diminish the sense of self-efficacy of the person with early-stage dementia. Besides methodological suggestions, suggestions are made how tailored interventions, like facilitating participation and portioning tasks, may help improve DC, relationship functioning, and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41525002What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.