ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Multilevel analysis of factors associated with abortion among adolescents in Uganda insights from UDHS 2022 dataset.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unsafe abortion is a major reproductive health challenge, causing 7.9% of global maternal deaths and 9.6% in East Africa. In Uganda, about 8% of maternal deaths result from unsafe abortions. Early sexual activity, poor access to sex education, restrictive laws and stigma push adolescents into unsafe practices. Limited safe services force many to use dangerous methods leading to severe complications and high maternal mortality. This study examined determinants and prevalence of abortion among Ugandan female adolescents using the 2022 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey dataset of 5,125 females aged 15-24 who had ever engaged in sexual activity. The dependent variable was binary (1 for ever terminated, 0 for never). Weighted data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ordinary and mixed effect logistic regression models to explore individual- and cluster-level influences. Intra-class correlation and likelihood ratio tests assessed cluster variation. Findings showed 562 adolescents had ever aborted. Those whose first sex was before age 15 were 3.44 times more likely to abort compared to those aged 20-24 while those aged 15-17 were 2.24 times more likely. Married adolescents had twice the odds compared to never married, and cohabiting adolescents were 2.44 times more likely. Compared to those with education beyond secondary, adolescents with no education, primary and secondary schooling were 5.8, 2.99 and 3.01 times more likely to abort. Regional variations accounted for 16.8% of variance, with intra-class correlation of 4.9%. Overall, 11.0% of Ugandan female adolescents reported abortion. Key determinants included age at first sex, marital status, education, contraceptive use and internet use. Region-level factors contributed 4.9% of variation highlighting the need for cluster-level interventions alongside individual approaches.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.