ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2026
Prediabetes, diabetes, and folate status among United States women of reproductive age: NHANES 2011-March 2020.
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPregestational diabetes increases the risk of adverse outcomes including congenital malformations, stillbirth, developmental disabilities, and maternal morbidity. Periconceptional glycemic control and folic acid (FA) supplementation are 2 of the most effective birth defects prevention strategies.
objectivesThe objectives are to describe the proportion of and risk factors for diabetes and prediabetes and assess the association of folate status and diabetes among a nationally representative sample of nonpregnant women of reproductive age (WRA).
methodsWRA (12‒49 y) from the NHANES 2011‒March 2020 (n = 3731) were included. Diabetes status was defined by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dL, or self-report. Prediabetes was defined as HbA1c ≥5.7 <6.5% or FPG ≥100 <126 mg/dL. The associations were assessed by multivariate regression models.
resultsAmong all WRA, 32.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.0%, 34.7%] had prediabetes and 5.3% (95% CI: 4.4%, 6.3%) had diabetes [1.8% undiagnosed, 95% CI: 1.4%, 2.3%; 3.1% diagnosed but uncontrolled (HbA1c ≥5.7), 95% CI: 2.5, 4.0; 0.4% diagnosed but controlled (HbA1c<5.7), 95% CI: 0.2, 0.6]. The prevalence of diabetes was associated with increased age, BMI, serum pyrazino-s-triazine, an oxidation form of 5'-methyltetrahydrofolate (MeFox), and red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations (all P < 0.0001) but not unmetabolized FA. Among WRA ≥35 y, 10.5% (95% CI: 8.5%, 12.8%) had diabetes and 40.3% (95% CI: 37.1%, 43.5%) had prediabetes. In adjusted regression models, diabetes was associated with altered folate metabolism [i.e., high (>90th %) RBC folate concentrations with lower (<400 μg/d) FA intake; adjusted odds ratio 2.28 (95% CI: 1.23, 4.24)]. Among those with diabetes, high serum MeFox and RBC folate concentrations were lower with euglycemia.
conclusionsDiabetes and prediabetes were common among WRA. Diabetes was associated with high RBC folate concentration and high MeFox despite low FA intake; however, these associations were reduced among those with good glycemic control. Screening for and preventing the progression of prediabetes, diagnosis, and glycemic control among those with diabetes has the potential to prevent adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.