SynthesisBMJ open quality2026
Role of real-world evidence from patient registries for psoriasis in decision-making: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTreatment of moderate to severe psoriasis typically requires the use of multiple systemic therapies over a patient's lifetime. The efficacy and safety of systemic treatments are typically evaluated in clinical trials; however, patient registries are increasingly used to monitor long-term outcomes of systemic therapies for psoriasis in real-world settings. Psoriasis registries also generate important real-world evidence about psoriasis treatment that may facilitate a greater understanding of outcomes outside of a controlled clinical trial setting. This study thus characterises the design and measures used in real-world studies of psoriasis treatment from patient registries and assesses its use in informing clinical guidelines and reimbursement decisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify real-world observational studies that used psoriasis registry data. PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language studies published between January 2018 and January 2023. To assess how real-world studies, clinical guidelines, and reimbursement and coverage reports have informed practice, treatment, and reimbursement guidelines, a narrative review of recommendations was conducted. All results were screened by two independent reviewers (LP and TAS) using prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Outcomes of interest were extracted into Excel, with all conflicts resolved through discussion/consensus. Tables displayed outcomes and research topics first by year, then by registry. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023402431.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.