ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2026
Technical Considerations for Blood RNA Sequencing in Genetic Testing: Evaluation of Globin Depletion Methods, Batch Effects, and Sample Types.
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blood RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is increasingly used to enhance diagnostic yield in genetic disorders; however, technical optimization is critical for clinical implementation. We evaluated key technical considerations for blood RNA-seq, including globin depletion methods, inter-batch variability, and sample types (whole blood vs. isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]). Methods: We compared the applicability of reagent-based globin removal (globin-RR) with bioinformatic globin removal (globin-BR) in whole-blood RNA-seq in terms of globin depletion efficiency and required sequencing depth, assessed batch effects in globin-RR samples using principal component and correlation analyses, and compared the use of whole blood versus PBMCs in terms of expression correlations and the number of detected Mendelian disease-associated genes. Results: Globin-RR performed better than globin-BR, achieved better coverage of clinically relevant Mendelian disease-associated genes (51.85% vs. 40.79%), and required fewer total sequencing reads (mean, ~107 vs. ~149 million) to obtain 100 million non-globin reads. Batch effects of globin-RR were low (inter-batch correlation, R Conclusions: Globin-RR is effective, reproducible, and practical for use in clinical whole-blood RNA-seq. With high concordance and a slightly broader gene detection range than whole blood, PBMCs are a viable alternative sample type for routine genetic diagnostic tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.