ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Predicting Cerebral Aneurysm Recurrence after Coil Embolization: A Novel Deep Learning Approach Using Time-of-flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recurrence of cerebral aneurysms after coil embolization remains a significant concern in clinical practice. This study introduced a novel approach that combines machine learning with deep learning techniques using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography to predict aneurysm recurrence. A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted on 154 patients with coil-embolized unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Three prediction models were developed: a logistic regression model, a neural network model using clinical data, and a combined deep learning model incorporating both clinical and imaging data obtained from 3-dimensional reconstructed time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. The combined model was created in 2 versions: 1 trained exclusively with pre-operative images and the other using both pre- and post-operative images. All models were evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation to assess the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Among the 154 cases, 46 (29.9%) demonstrated recurrence. The combined model that incorporated both pre- and post-operative time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography images achieved the best discriminative performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.822 and sensitivity of 0.848, indicating a reliable capacity to identify patients at risk of recurrence. The version that used only pre-operative images showed relatively high accuracy (0.766) and specificity (0.833) but a lower overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. These results highlight the value of integrating time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography data into artificial intelligence-driven predictive models to improve the assessment of recurrence risk after coil embolization. The improved performance of the combined model, particularly when including post-operative images, demonstrates potential for more precise, individualized risk prediction and may contribute to better patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.