ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Postoperative symptom trajectories in early-stage lung cancer: a latent transition analysis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative symptoms in lung cancer patients are complex and dynamic, yet recovery is highly heterogeneous. Traditional analyses often fail to capture individual recovery trajectories, limiting the ability to provide personalized care. This study aimed to identify distinct postoperative symptom trajectories and their clinical predictors using a person-centered approach.
methodsWe conducted a prospective longitudinal study with 394 patients undergoing uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (uniportal VATS) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Patient-reported symptoms were collected at 1, 7, 14, and 30 days postoperatively. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify distinct symptom profiles, and Latent Transition Analysis (LTA) modeled the transitions between these profiles over time. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors of these transitions.
resultsLPA identified two distinct recovery profiles: a "Rapid Recovery" group (C1) and a "High-Symptom, Slow Recovery" group (C2). The first postoperative week was a critical window, with 73.0% of patients in the High-Symptom, Slow Recovery group transitioning to the Rapid Recovery group. This transition rate slowed significantly in subsequent weeks. A higher ASA classification, use of a thicker chest tube, and extensive lymph node dissection predicted a slower recovery. Conversely, better pulmonary function (FEV1%, MVV%) facilitated a faster transition, while postoperative complications were associated with a negative trajectory shift.
conclusionsPostoperative recovery in lung cancer patients follows predictable, heterogeneous trajectories. This person-centered approach enables the early identification of high-risk patients based on preoperative and surgical factors. Understanding these distinct pathways allows for a shift from a one-size-fits-all model to staged, personalized interventions designed to optimize symptom management and enhance patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41526469What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.