ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of key factors for early detection of rheumatoid arthritis in primary care using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic disease that causes irreversible joint damage. Early detection, especially in primary care settings, is crucial for effective disease management. This study aimed to identify the factors that help screen individuals at risk of RA to reduce delays in referral to rheumatologists. This analytical and applied research used a questionnaire to gather data from 377 patients at a rheumatology diagnostic center in Ahvaz, Iran, between August and November 2024. Study variables included patients' articular and extra-articular symptoms at disease onset, demographic data, and initial laboratory markers. After performing statistical correlation analysis, the dataset was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets. Five machine learning models were developed, and the SHAP method was applied to the best-performing model to identify influential features. The results were obtained via 5-fold nested cross-validation, which identified the CatBoost model as the top performer, with AUC-ROC = 0.966, Accuracy = 0.947, and F1-Score = 0.951. SHAP (with a threshold of 0.01) highlighted the following significant features: Anti-CCP, tender joint count, swollen joint count, gastrointestinal issues, fatigue, age, RF (Rheumatoid Factor), and hearing problems. Due to the importance of early RA diagnosis and the challenges encountered in primary care, three main screening factors stand out: Anti-CCP, tender joint count, and swollen joint count. These, along with fatigue, age, and positive RF, markedly increase the likelihood of RA and justify referring a patient to a specialist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.