ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026
The gut microbiome in solid-organ and haematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation.
Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Microbiome Associations with Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Adult Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Population Pharmacokinetic and Machine Learning.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Microbiome-Targeted Modulation in Renal Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Kidney Transplantation and the Gut-Kidney Axis: Microbial, Metabolic, and Nutritional Implications for Graft and Patient Outcomes.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Tea Polysaccharides Ameliorates Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Mice via Regulating Macrophages Polarization by Gut Microbial Metabolites.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid-organ transplantation (for example, kidney or liver) and haematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation have revolutionized treatment of end-stage organ failure and haematological malignancies. However, long-term outcomes are often undermined by complications such as allograft rejection, graft-versus-host disease in haematopoietic-stem-cell recipients, opportunistic infections, adverse effects of drugs and decreased quality of life. Emerging evidence now highlights the gut microbiome and its metabolites (such as short-chain fatty acids) as a potentially modifiable factor influencing transplantation outcomes. Transplantation recipients frequently exhibit gut dysbiosis, which has been linked to graft function, risk of infection (for example, vulnerability to multidrug-resistant bacteria), immune-mediated complications and patient survival. Furthermore, pharmacomicrobiomics studies indicate that microorganisms can metabolize immunosuppressive drugs into less active forms (such as the conversion of the immunosuppressive drug tacrolimus into less active or toxic forms through keto-reduction, glucuronidation or deconjugation) or can activate prodrugs (such as the conversion of mycophenolate mofetil into mycophenolic acid), thereby modulating drug efficacy and safety. Here, we discuss how the intestinal ecosystem is altered and persistently shaped by transplantation-related factors and immunosuppression and how these changes correlate with clinical outcomes. We provide a perspective on leveraging microbiome insights, through biomarkers or microbiome-targeted interventions, to improve outcomes in solid-organ and stem-cell transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41526566What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.