ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2026
Artificial intelligence agents in cancer research and oncology.
Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical decision support in hematological malignancies using a case-grounded AI agent.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- AI agents in cancer imaging: Concepts, advances, and clinical perspectives.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Agentic AI in oncology: autonomous workflows for clinical decision support and evidence synthesis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Digital Nutritional Care in Oncology: Opportunities to Enhance Quality of Life and Support Patient-Centered Care.Cancers · 2026Review
- Agentic AI for interdisciplinary clinical decision support in high-stakes care.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Predicts Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk from Routine Clinical Data: A Large Population-Based Multicentric Study.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- Evolving Landscape for Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Histopathologic Assessment of Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer.Head and neck pathology · 2026Review
- OncoBERT: Context-Aware Modeling of Somatic Mutations for Precision Oncology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in nutritional oncology: From isolated screening tools to agentic intervention systems.Oncotarget · 2026Article
- The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Review
- Precision oncology: from large language models to multi-agent systems.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2022, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have progressed far beyond their established capabilities of data classification and prediction. Large language models (LLMs) can perform logical reasoning, enabling them to plan and orchestrate complex workflows. By using this planning ability and equipped with the ability to act upon their environment, LLMs can function as agents. Agents are (semi-)autonomous systems capable of sensing, learning and acting upon their environments. As such, they can interact with external knowledge or external software and can execute sequences of tasks with minimal or no human input. In cancer research and oncology, evidence for the capability of AI agents is rapidly emerging. From autonomously optimizing drug design and development to proposing therapeutic strategies for clinical cases, AI agents can handle complex, multistep problems that were not addressable by previous generations of AI systems. Despite rapid developments, many translational and clinical cancer researchers still lack clarity regarding the precise capabilities, limitations, and ethical or regulatory frameworks associated with AI agents. Here we provide a primer on AI agents for cancer researchers and oncologists. We illustrate how this technology is set apart from and goes beyond traditional AI systems. We discuss existing and emerging applications in cancer research and address real-world challenges from the perspective of academic, clinical and industrial research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41526721What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.