ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease using longitudinal electronic health records of US military veterans.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly prediction of Alzheimer's disease is important for timely intervention and treatment. We examine whether machine learning on longitudinal electronic health record notes can improve early prediction of Alzheimer's disease.
methodsFrom Veterans Health Administration records (2000 to 2022), we studied 61,537 individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and 234,105 without, aged 45-103 years, 98.4% were male. From clinical notes, we quantified the frequency of subjective cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease-related keywords, and applied statistical machine learning models to assess their ability to predict future diagnosis.
resultsHere we show that Alzheimer's-related keywords (e.g., "concentration," "speaking"), occur more often in notes of individuals who later develop Alzheimer's disease than in controls. In the 15 years preceding diagnosis, cases demonstrate an exponential increase in keyword mentions (from 9.4 to 57.7 per year), whereas controls show a slower, linear increase (8.2 to 20.3). These trends are consistent across demographic subgroups. Random forest models using these keywords for prediction achieve an area under receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.577 at ten years before diagnosis to 0.861 one day before diagnosis, consistently outperforming models using only structured data.
conclusionsSigns and symptoms of early Alzheimer's disease are reported in clinical notes many years before a clinical diagnosis is made and the frequency of these signs and symptoms, approximated by keywords, increases the closer one is to the diagnosis. A simple keyword-based approach can capture these signals and can help identify individuals at high risk of future Alzheimer's disease.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.