ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Pregnancy and early neurodevelopment after prenatal ventriculomegaly: a 2011-2024 single-center retrospective cohort of 983 cases.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate pregnancy and early neurodevelopmental outcomes in fetuses with prenatally diagnosed ventriculomegaly (VM) in a large single-center retrospective cohort (2011-2024), and to determine the independent predictive value of VM severity, isolation status, laterality, and intrauterine evolution for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among term survivors.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included fetuses diagnosed with VM at West China Second University Hospital from 2011 to 2024. VM was defined as a lateral ventricular width ≥ 10 mm measured on standardized axial trans-thalamo-ventricular planes and categorized as mild (10-12 mm), moderate (12.1-15 mm), or severe (> 15 mm) per SMFM/ISUOG guidelines. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were extracted from medical records. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in term liveborn infants were assessed through structured telephone interviews and clinical documentation; for children born between 2019 and 2024, systematic follow-up at 2-3 years of age was implemented, with Gesell Developmental Schedule assessments performed when developmental concerns were identified. For those born between 2011 and 2018, outcomes were based on parental reports and available medical records. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted associations.
resultsVM was identified in 983 of 154,436 deliveries (0.64%). Live birth rates were 94.8% for mild, 85.9% for moderate, and 24.6% for severe VM. Among 654 term survivors, 39 (5.96%) exhibited abnormal neurodevelopment. In univariable analyses, greater VM severity, bilateral VM, variation of ventricular width, and abnormal postnatal cranial ultrasound findings were significantly associated with adverse neurodevelopment. After adjustment, only ventricular severity remained independently predictive, with adjusted odds ratios of 2.77 (95% CI, 1.31-5.85) for moderate and 7.57 (95% CI, 1.34-42.61) for severe VM compared with mild VM. Non-isolated VM showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased risk (OR 1.64; 95% CI, 0.65-4.14).
conclusionsVentricular severity was the only prenatal factor that remained independently associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in this cohort, whereas associations with laterality, isolation status, and postnatal imaging findings attenuated after adjustment. Through a unified diagnostic pathway incorporating systematic neurosonography, selective fetal magnetic resonance imaging, and chromosomal microarray testing, this large Asian cohort adds real-world data supporting severity-based risk stratification and illustrating the potential value of multimodal prenatal evaluation for perinatal counseling and management. Given the retrospective design and non-standardized follow-up, however, these associations should be interpreted with caution.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.