ReviewBMC nephrology2026
Clinical rationale behind glucose-sparing strategies in peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review.
Review in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic potential of amino acid-based peritoneal dialysis solutions: a systematic review.BMC nephrology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis (PD) relies on dialysate-induced solute and water transport across the peritoneal membrane, facilitated by concentration and type of osmotic agents. Standard PD solutions predominantly use glucose as an osmotic agent due to its well-known metabolism, effective ultrafiltration during shorter dwells, and low cost. However, glucose exposure may damage the structure and function of the peritoneal membrane and cause systemic metabolic complications, including insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease, underscoring the need for glucose-sparing strategies with alternative solutions, such as solutions with icodextrin and amino acids as osmotic agents, and glucose-based, less bioincompatible fluids with physiological pH and reduced glucose degradation products. This brief narrative review examines the unwanted effects of glucose-based solutions and the clinical rationales behind glucose-sparing strategies that may reduce these effects and potentially improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.