Evidence mapPaperPMID 41526903Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Family engagement in intensive care: perceptions, barriers, and facilitators among nurses in Saudi Arabia.

Jennifer de Beer, Tagwa Omer, Veronica Filipinas, Wadea Beheri, Eman Bawazer, Liza Cronje, Haia Aldossary, Joy Barrios, Eman Ascano, Lama Alshowaiman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jennifer de BeerKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Tagwa OmerCollege of Nursing, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Veronica FilipinasKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Wadea BeheriKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Eman BawazerKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Liza CronjeKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Haia AldossaryKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Joy BarriosKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Eman AscanoKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Lama AlshowaimanKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Hawazen RawasDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain. hawazenor@agu.edu.bh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily engagement is a core component of patient- and family-centered intensive care. In Saudi Arabia, its implementation is shaped by cultural expectations, resource availability, and the preparedness of nursing staff. Despite its recognized significance, research examining intensive care nurses’ perspectives on family involvement in this context remains limited.

aimThis study examines intensive care nurses’ perceptions of family engagement and identifies factors that facilitate or impede its implementation.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized across 17 intensive care units in three tertiary hospitals in Western Saudi Arabia. Cluster random sampling was used to select 372 nurses. Data collection involved the Questionnaire on Factors That Influence Family Engagement (QFIFE) (α = 0.70–0.87), which evaluates the ICU environment, patient acuity, workflow, and attitudes. Five open-ended questions were included to further explore nurses’ experiences. Quantitative data were analyzed using SAS, and qualitative data were subjected to content analysis.

resultsThe participating nurses had a mean age of 36 years. The majority were women (88.7%), ICU-certified (62.5%), and originated from the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, or Malaysia. Overall, nurses reported positive attitudes toward family engagement (mean = 4.0) and perceived their environments as supportive (means 3.8–4.2). Concerns were noted regarding workflow (means 3.3–3.8), and nurses expressed greater caution about family involvement in high-acuity cases (means 2.9–3.4). Nurses with family-nursing training demonstrated greater awareness of relevant policies and perceived more benefits in symptom assessment. Non-ICU-certified nurses were more receptive to family involvement in unstable or life-sustaining situations. Open-ended responses identified facilitators, including patient- and family-centered care, decision-making, staffing, policies, education, and communication. Reported barriers included knowledge and communication gaps, limited time and space, infection-control protocols, and family emotional distress.

conclusionThe findings indicate that nurses generally support family engagement; however, they encounter challenges due to heavy workloads, patient acuity, and families’ emotional and psychological needs. Enhancing policies, staffing, and training, in conjunction with culturally sensitive approaches, is essential for establishing family engagement as a safe and sustainable component of intensive care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical Care NursingFamilyNursing Staff, HospitalProfessional-Family RelationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesFamily engagementICUIntensive care nursingPatient- and family-centred careQFIFESaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41526903
PMCPMC12888630

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.