SynthesisJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Time-restricted eating in overweight and obese adults: an evidence summary and clinical recommendations.
Synthesis in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review aims to synthesize the current evidence and develop evidence-based recommendations regarding time-restricted eating (TRE) for weight management in adults with overweight and obesity, addressing a gap in specific clinical guidelines.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of nine databases and six websites for relevant literature up to September 2024. Included studies comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, and systematic reviews focusing on TRE in the target population. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment using standardized tools (e.g., AMSTAR 2, AGREE II, JBI checklists). Evidence was synthesized thematically, and recommendations were graded using the JBI framework.
resultsThe search identified 5535 records. After screening, 25 articles were included: five guidelines, three expert consensuses, eight systematic reviews, and nine RCTs. The synthesis yielded 39 key evidence points across six domains: applicable populations, intervention protocols, dietary considerations, psychological and sleep effects, efficacy, and safety. The synthesized evidence suggests that TRE can induce significant weight loss and improve cardiometabolic parameters (e.g., blood glucose and lipid profiles) in the short to medium term. While heterogeneity exists across individual studies, this review identifies key factors (e.g., eating window protocols, adherence) that may influence outcomes and provides a framework for clinical decision-making.
conclusionsTRE represents a promising dietary intervention for adults with overweight and obesity. This review provides a structured evidence summary and practical recommendations to guide its clinical application. Future research should focus on the long-term efficacy, sustainability, and impact of TRE on hard clinical endpoints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.