ArticleBMC psychology2026
Psychological flexibility patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associations with self-care behavior and medical condition.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to elucidate the relationships of psychological flexibility (PF) patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with physiological and lifestyle indexes.
methodsThe study recruited 223 inpatients and outpatients for the survey. It focused on levels of experiential avoidance (EA) and subgroups of comprehensive PF patterns. The differences in self-care behavior and medical condition between high- and low-EA groups were examined using t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Furthermore, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted to depict group features after applying cluster analysis to extract PF patterns.
resultsAnalyses revealed that low-EA patients exhibited better conditions. A subsequent cluster analysis extracted three subgroups: flexible, inaction, and entangled. The distinguishing characteristics were manifested in the patterns of fusion, values, and commitment. In general, the flexible subgroup exhibited optimal conditions that align with those reported in previous studies and theoretical assumptions of acceptance and commitment therapy.
conclusionConsidering these findings and their commonality with previous research, the study recommended that assessments focusing on processes-specifically cognitive fusion, and values and commitment, in addition to EA-may yield valuable insights for healthcare providers and emphasize the potential utility of a tiered intervention guide that first targets fusion, followed by values and commitment.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.