ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Dysbiotic shift in the oral microbiota of patients with Alzheimer's disease compared to their healthy life partners-a combinatorial approach and a paired study design.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Red Complex Pathogens, Periodontal Dysbiosis and Periodontal Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Oral Microbiota and Alzheimer's Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study Based on East Asian Ethnicity.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Potential value of oral Mogibacterium in major depressive disorder.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe oral microbiota has been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, earlier studies provided conflicting results using varying sampling methods, sequencing techniques, and statistics, as well as independent subjects.
methodsTo robustly identify disease-associated microbial features, we recruited patients and their healthy life partners from the same households sharing a more similar microbiota compared to independent individuals increasing statistical power via paired design and combined three different sequencing methods - including metagenomics-and several bioinformatic pipelines. We recruited 26 AD-patients and their life partners. Salivary and supragingival samples were collected and a clinical examination of the mouth was performed.
resultsBoth groups showed comparable oral health. By focusing primarily on recurrently identified species across the different datasets we were able to identify a Core dysbiosis. This Core dysbiosis surprisingly spares the most central of oral diseases pathogens, namely Porphyromonas gingivalis. However, it includes numerous other species commonly associated with oral pathologies such as Prevotella nigrescens, Streptococcus anginosus, Dialister invisus, Anaeroglobus geminatus, Olsenella uli and Mogibacterium timidum. In contrast, more host-compatible species such as Prevotella melaninogenica or Streptococcus parasanguinis are identified in controls.
conclusionsThis is the first study using a combined sequencing approach and a paired study design to identify robust features of the oral microbiota of AD-patients. Although promising, the results should nevertheless be interpreted with caution, as the cross-sectional study design limits the possibilities of interpretation, and larger, longitudinal data are necessary for causal conclusions. However, this combined approach on multiple processing levels to identify intra-partnership differences still offers the possibility to better identify disease-associated microbial features potentially involved in AD-pathogenesis.
trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023456) at the 30th of November 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.