ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Construction and validation of a predictive model for reversible cognitive frailty in elderly people in nursing homes.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the factors affecting reversible cognitive frailty in older adults in nursing homes, to construct a risk prediction model, and to validate its prediction performance.
methodOlder adults from five nursing homes in Liaoning Province, China, were selected as the study subjects from April to October 2024, and the data were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set according to 8:2. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors affecting reversible cognitive frailty in older adults in nursing homes, and a column-line graph model was constructed using R software (4.4.1).
resultA total of 311 cases of older adults were included, of which 86 cases (27.7%) had reversible cognitive frailty. The AUCs of the training and validation sets were 0.852 and 0.805, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test values were P = 0.513 and 0.796 (both > 0.05).
conclusionThe risk prediction model constructed in this study has good predictive performance, which is beneficial for institutional workers in providing early warning of the risk of reversible cognitive frailty for older adults and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.