ArticlePlant methods2026
Crop phenotype prediction using SNP context and whole-genome feature embedding based on DNABERT-2.
Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundModern agriculture demands precise genomic prediction to accelerate elite crop breeding, yet traditional genomic prediction approaches, such as genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and Bayesian methods, focus primarily on the cumulative effect of individual SNPs, thus neglecting the concerted influence that the surrounding sequence context has on the phenotype.
methodsTo overcome these limitations, we propose two novel feature embedding modes (SNP-context and whole-genome) based on DNABERT-2, a cross-species genomic foundation model that uses self-attention mechanisms and transfer learning to automatically identify conserved sequence features across diverse evolutionary lineages without prior biological assumptions. The whole-genome feature embedding aggregates genomic information at a global scale by pooling vectors from chunked sequences processed by DNABERT-2, whereas the context feature embedding captures local information by directly encoding variable-length (500-3000 bp) sequences centered on target SNPs. To reduce noise in the high-dimensional feature embeddings, we employed principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) to project the features into a lower-dimensional space. We generated two kinds of feature embedding for three crop datasets (rice413, rice395, and maize301), investigated the impact of 500-3000 bp flanking SNP contexts on phenotypic prediction, and compared prediction accuracy variations across algorithms at 4-768 feature dimensions among the PCA, PLS, and no dimensionality reduction strategies.
resultsThe results demonstrate that machine learning (ML) algorithms operating under the SNP-context embedding mode achieve greater accuracy and lower mean absolute errors (MAEs) than traditional SNP features, with performance peaking at optimal context lengths that proved to be trait-dependent (e.g., 1000 bp to 3000 bp), particularly for traits with low-to-moderate heritability (H
conclusionsThe proposed feature embedding methods, which leverage DNABERT-2 to capture the contextual features of SNPs, effectively overcome the limitations of traditional prediction models. This study demonstrates that the SNP-context mode is superior for traits with low-to-moderate heritability, while the whole-genome embedding mode excels for highly heritable ones. Our work provides plant breeders with a flexible and powerful analytical framework, enabling them to select the most suitable phenotypic prediction method based on the complexity of the target trait, thereby accelerating genetic gain in the breeding of elite crop varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.