ArticleBMC health services research2026
From evidence to action: contextual determinants for the pre-implementation of a foot-ankle exercise program for diabetes in primary care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant public health challenge, associated with progressive chronic complications such as visual, renal, and foot-related impairments. Diabetic polyneuropathy is a major contributor to foot ulcers, infections, and lower-limb amputations. The FOot CAre and Exercises ImplementatioN for People with Diabetes in Primary Care (FOCAIN) project was developed to implement a foot and ankle exercise program, combined with self-care education, aimed at reducing risk factors for foot ulcers in individuals with DM within primary care in Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil. This study reports findings from the pre-implementation phase, focused on context analysis and identification of implementation barriers and facilitators.
methodsEighty-four primary health care professionals were invited to participate in a brainstorming activity using a semi-structured interview guide based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Rapid analysis, as described by Nevedal et al., was used to identify key barriers and facilitators. Staff adoption and representativeness were evaluated using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance).
resultsA total of 71.8% of primary care units and 100% of multidisciplinary teams were represented, with participation from 54 professionals (21 nurses, 21 community health workers, 3 nutritionists, 3 social workers, 2 psychologists, 2 physical therapists, and 1 nursing technician), resulting in an adoption rate of 65.8% (RE-AIM). Of the 24 CFIR constructs explored, 17 were identified as key implementation determinants. Barriers included limited resources, lack of targeted public policies, physician-centered care culture, and inadequate infrastructure. Facilitators included strong and credible evidence supporting the intervention, institutional support, and high professional engagement.
conclusionsThe pre-implementation analysis revealed a promising context for FOCAIN implementation in Limeira. Professional commitment and municipal support were crucial facilitators. However, workforce limitations, especially in multidisciplinary teams, present ongoing challenges. Strengthening collaboration between academic institutions and local health system leadership is critical for overcoming barriers and enabling sustainable implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.