ArticleBMC psychology2026
Factors influencing a health-promoting lifestyle in participants after undergoing repeat percutaneous coronary intervention based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease is a leading cause of global mortality, for which percutaneous coronary intervention serves as a critical revascularization strategy. Despite the recognized importance of health-promoting behaviors, participants face significant challenges in adopting and sustaining these behaviors post-procedurally. Current research predominantly focuses on primary PCI participants, leaving a gap in the systematic investigation of unique factors influencing health-promoting lifestyles specifically within the higher-risk population undergoing repeat PCI. This distinct subgroup often presents with a history of behavioral relapse, greater psychological distress, and altered risk perception, which may not be adequately addressed in standard care. Therefore, this study employs the (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour) model to elucidate the multifaceted barriers affecting the maintenance of a health-promoting lifestyle in this distinct participants cohort.
objectiveTo explore the factors influencing whether participants adopt a healthy lifestyle after repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, to provide healthcare professionals with a theoretical basis from which they can develop targeted intervention programmes.
methodsA descriptive phenomenological research method was used to develop an interview outline, using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model as a guide. Sixteen participants who underwent repeat coronary intervention were selected to participate in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method to summarise and extract themes.
resultsCapability-related factors included inaccurate knowledge of the disease, inadequate skills to manage medication, lack of physical strength and health limitations, and poor skills for psychological and emotional adjustment. Opportunity-related factors included insufficient family and environmental support, limited access to medical resources, conflicts with regional dietary habits, and the influence of work habits. Motivation-related factors included a willingness to proactively manage health, psychological and emotional regulation, behavioural relapse, and inertia.
conclusionMultiple factors influence the adoption of health-promoting lifestyles in participants undergoing repeat percutaneous coronary intervention. Healthcare professionals need to consider several perspectives to improve participants’ knowledge of how to promote their health after surgery and reduce barriers to health-promoting behaviours. This will help improve the overall health of participants in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.