ReviewJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2026
Pharmacological management of agitation in dementia: An evidence-based review with expert consensus.
Review in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Agitation in dementia: Evidence-based consensus recommendations.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agitation is a frequently occurring and challenging neuropsychiatric symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that substantially affects quality of life, caregiver burden, and healthcare utilization. Nonpharmacological interventions, especially trigger identification, environmental adjustments, and supportive activities, remain the first-line approach for treating agitation. Pharmacological treatment should be considered only when nondrug measures are insufficient or when agitation causes severe distress or safety risks. This consensus integrates evidence up to June 2025, the Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare approval status, and expert opinion from Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Among the approved agents, brexpiprazole demonstrated the strongest evidence and most favorable safety profile. Risperidone and aripiprazole are effective, but require careful monitoring for cerebrovascular and extrapyramidal risks. Selected antidepressants, particularly citalopram and agomelatine, should be considered when safety is prioritized. Anticonvulsants, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and memantine have limited efficacy and should be reserved for refractory cases. Long-term or routine pharmacological use is not supported by current evidence. Future research should focus on identifying responsive patient subgroups, optimizing dosing strategies, and integrating medications into individualized, multidisciplinary care plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.