ArticlePalliative & supportive care2026
Role of clinical pharmacists in palliative care team: A scoping review.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deprescribing decisions in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of multi-stakeholder experiences and influencing factors.BMC palliative care · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesClinical pharmacists are increasingly recognized as essential members of multidisciplinary palliative care teams, yet their specific roles and impact have not been comprehensively summarized. This scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesize published evidence on the clinical roles, interventions, and professional contributions of pharmacists within multidisciplinary palliative care services for patients with non-communicable diseases.
methodsA scoping review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2000 to May 2024. Eligible studies reported clinical pharmacist interventions in palliative care. Data were extracted on study characteristics, pharmacist activities, and clinical outcomes.
resultsTwelve studies were included, predominantly from the United States. Pharmacist-led interventions encompassed medication reconciliation (91.7%), symptom management (83.3%), adverse drug event prevention (75.0%), patient and caregiver education (58.3%), and policy-level contributions (33.3%). High physician acceptance rates (≥90%) were consistently reported. Outcomes included improved symptom control, reduced drug-related problems, and enhanced patient-reported quality of life. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsThis scoping review synthesizes current evidence on the roles of clinical pharmacists in palliative care teams. The findings highlight their essential contributions to medication safety, symptom management, deprescribing, and opioid stewardship, reinforcing the need for pharmacist integration into multidisciplinary palliative care models to improve patient-centered outcomes. Future research should focus on implementation models, cost-effectiveness analyses, and service expansion in community-based settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.