Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41528669›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2026

Are Health Nudges (Dis)Empowering?

Per-Anders Tengland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Per-Anders TenglandHealth and Society, Malmö University, Jan Waldenströms gata 25, 205 06, Malmö, Sweden. per-anders.tengland@mau.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1224-3291

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health nudges have become popular in public health and health promotion, not least in countries that have liberal or libertarian policies. One reason is that nudges aim to change people's health-related behavior in a positive direction without infringing upon their freedom. There are other strategies to try to achieve health. Comparing behavior change and empowerment models, previous research found that empowerment is morally recommendable, both as a strategy and as a goal. Empowered people are good at taking care of their health. Using empowerment as an evaluative model, this paper investigates to what extent nudging as a health-promotion strategy leads to empowerment. Nudging can be empowering insofar as it leads to better health, although its effects on people's empowerment might be rather small, depending on whether the nudge creates a healthy habit or not. However, nudges do not, in general, have positive effects on other empowering factors, such as a person's knowledge, skills, self-confidence, self-esteem, or autonomy, since nudges typically bypass deliberate reflection. Moreover, nudging belongs to a group of manipulative strategies that appear to be detrimental to people's ability for autonomy. Thus, nudges risk being disempowering.

Indexed as

EmpowermentHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionPower, PsychologicalHumansPersonal AutonomySelf ConceptAutonomyEmpowermentHealth promotionLibertarian paternalismNudgesPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41528669
PMCPMC13086823

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.