ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
Revisiting alpha-theta cross-frequency dynamics during working memory.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior EEG research has shown that during working memory, alpha (8 to 14 Hz) and theta (4 to 8 Hz) oscillations tend to form a 2:1 frequency ratio. According to the Binary Hierarchy Brain Body Oscillation Theory (BHBBOT), a recent model grounded in mathematical analysis, this cross-frequency configuration reflects enhanced connectivity between brain regions generating these rhythms. However, this prediction has not yet been empirically tested. In this study, we leveraged high density EEG, source localization and connectivity metrics derived from Information Theory (IT) and the Theory of Weakly Coupled Oscillators (TWCO) to examine whether the previously observed alpha-theta cross-frequency dynamics during working memory are accompanied by changes in connectivity. Our results show that a significant increase in the proportion of 2:1 ratios between regions generating frontal theta and parietal alpha rhythms was accompanied by relative decreases in connectivity, as revealed by both IT and TWCO metrics. Furthermore, phase synchrony between these two regions was significantly reduced during working memory and correlated negatively with behavioral performance. In conclusion, our results show that the increased occurrence of 2:1 alpha:theta cross-frequency ratios during working memory reflects functional segregation (rather than integration) and therefore directly challenges some of the predictions of the BHBBOT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.