Evidence mapPaperPMID 41528871Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Brain glucodynamic variability is an essential feature of the metabolism-cognition relationship.

Hamish A Deery, Emma Liang, Chris Moran, Gary F Egan, Sharna D Jamadar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Brain glucodynamic variability is an essential feature of the metabolism-cognition relationship.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamish A DeerySchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1052-4516
Emma LiangSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9906-2804
Chris MoranSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.
Gary F EganMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-4026
Sharna D JamadarSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7222-7181

Funding

DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1174164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variability ensures that complex biological systems, including the brain, are capable of responding to changing environmental demands. While the importance of neural variability in electrophysiological and hemodynamic aspects of brain activity is beginning to be understood, little is known about how variability in molecular activity influences brain function. Here, we examine how temporal variability in

Indexed as

AgingBrainCognitionGlucoseFemaleHumansGlucoseagingcognitiondynamic glucose use

Identifiers

PMID41528871
PMCPMC12818426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.