ArticleThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres2026
Nurse Practitioners' Experiences Navigating Treatment Decision-Making Affecting Older People with Neurocognitive Disorders and Cancer.
Article in The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and PurposeNurse practitioners (NPs) make treatment decisions impacting older people with neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), like mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Research has shown that when this patient population has cancer, they face barriers accessing care, have higher mortality rates and limited involvement in decision-making. Despite their critical role, few NPs have been included in studies exploring treatment decision-making affecting this population. To improve experiences for older people and their families, this study explored NPs' decision-making experiences when individuals were living with an NCD and cancer.MethodsThis qualitative study was informed by interpretive description, a practice-oriented approach. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews and reflective journaling. Data analysis was iterative with identification and revision of themes that have accompanying illustrations. The research team drew on relevant nursing and practice knowledge to identify meaningful implications for NP practice.ResultsFive themes were identified which included the observation that participants' decision-making was shaped by NPs' knowledge and assumptions. NP participants experienced uncertainty and ethical challenges while needing to creatively navigate health systems. Drawing on nursing knowledge, NPs sought to actively involve older people and their family in decision making.ConclusionNPs experience complex treatment decision-making when older people are living with an NCD and cancer, requiring navigation of multiple factors and challenges. The results showed shared decision-making processes are applied, suggesting that NPs take up relational treatment decision-making practices. However, there is a need for institutional change, further education, and research about NPs experiences in community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.